Correlation Between Penn National and 49327M3G7
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Penn National Gaming and KEY 47 26 JAN 26, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Penn National and 49327M3G7 and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Penn National with a short position of 49327M3G7. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Penn National and 49327M3G7.
Diversification Opportunities for Penn National and 49327M3G7
0.28 | Correlation Coefficient |
Modest diversification
The 3 months correlation between Penn and 49327M3G7 is 0.28. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Penn National Gaming and KEY 47 26 JAN 26 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KEY 47 26 and Penn National is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Penn National Gaming are associated (or correlated) with 49327M3G7. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KEY 47 26 has no effect on the direction of Penn National i.e., Penn National and 49327M3G7 go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Penn National and 49327M3G7
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Penn National Gaming is expected to under-perform the 49327M3G7. In addition to that, Penn National is 5.15 times more volatile than KEY 47 26 JAN 26. It trades about -0.03 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. KEY 47 26 JAN 26 is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 9,974 in KEY 47 26 JAN 26 on December 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (293.00) from holding KEY 47 26 JAN 26 or give up 2.94% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 81.36% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Penn National Gaming vs. KEY 47 26 JAN 26
Performance |
Timeline |
Penn National Gaming |
KEY 47 26 |
Penn National and 49327M3G7 Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Penn National and 49327M3G7
The main advantage of trading using opposite Penn National and 49327M3G7 positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Penn National position performs unexpectedly, 49327M3G7 can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in 49327M3G7 will offset losses from the drop in 49327M3G7's long position.Penn National vs. DraftKings | Penn National vs. MGM Resorts International | Penn National vs. Caesars Entertainment | Penn National vs. Boyd Gaming |
49327M3G7 vs. BlueScope Steel Ltd | 49327M3G7 vs. Nippon Steel Corp | 49327M3G7 vs. Canlan Ice Sports | 49327M3G7 vs. Olympic Steel |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.
Other Complementary Tools
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk |