Correlation Between Penn National and 02005NBS8
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Penn National Gaming and ALLY 67 14 FEB 33, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Penn National and 02005NBS8 and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Penn National with a short position of 02005NBS8. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Penn National and 02005NBS8.
Diversification Opportunities for Penn National and 02005NBS8
0.52 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Penn and 02005NBS8 is 0.52. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Penn National Gaming and ALLY 67 14 FEB 33 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ALLY 67 14 and Penn National is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Penn National Gaming are associated (or correlated) with 02005NBS8. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ALLY 67 14 has no effect on the direction of Penn National i.e., Penn National and 02005NBS8 go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Penn National and 02005NBS8
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Penn National Gaming is expected to generate 1.65 times more return on investment than 02005NBS8. However, Penn National is 1.65 times more volatile than ALLY 67 14 FEB 33. It trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. ALLY 67 14 FEB 33 is currently generating about -0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest 1,870 in Penn National Gaming on December 25, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (136.00) from holding Penn National Gaming or give up 7.27% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 98.36% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Penn National Gaming vs. ALLY 67 14 FEB 33
Performance |
Timeline |
Penn National Gaming |
ALLY 67 14 |
Penn National and 02005NBS8 Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Penn National and 02005NBS8
The main advantage of trading using opposite Penn National and 02005NBS8 positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Penn National position performs unexpectedly, 02005NBS8 can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in 02005NBS8 will offset losses from the drop in 02005NBS8's long position.Penn National vs. DraftKings | Penn National vs. MGM Resorts International | Penn National vs. Caesars Entertainment | Penn National vs. Boyd Gaming |
02005NBS8 vs. Molecular Partners AG | 02005NBS8 vs. Dyadic International | 02005NBS8 vs. Vacasa Inc | 02005NBS8 vs. Pinterest |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Volatility Analysis module to get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data.
Other Complementary Tools
Sign In To Macroaxis Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules | |
Equity Valuation Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data | |
CEOs Directory Screen CEOs from public companies around the world | |
Funds Screener Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges | |
Sectors List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities |