Correlation Between Penn National and Phillips Edison

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Penn National and Phillips Edison at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Penn National and Phillips Edison into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Penn National Gaming and Phillips Edison Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Penn National and Phillips Edison and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Penn National with a short position of Phillips Edison. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Penn National and Phillips Edison.

Diversification Opportunities for Penn National and Phillips Edison

0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Penn and Phillips is 0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Penn National Gaming and Phillips Edison Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Phillips Edison and Penn National is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Penn National Gaming are associated (or correlated) with Phillips Edison. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Phillips Edison has no effect on the direction of Penn National i.e., Penn National and Phillips Edison go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Penn National and Phillips Edison

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Penn National Gaming is expected to generate 2.72 times more return on investment than Phillips Edison. However, Penn National is 2.72 times more volatile than Phillips Edison Co. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Phillips Edison Co is currently generating about -0.27 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,986  in Penn National Gaming on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (19.00) from holding Penn National Gaming or give up 0.96% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Penn National Gaming  vs.  Phillips Edison Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Penn National Gaming 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Penn National Gaming are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Penn National is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Phillips Edison 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Phillips Edison Co are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy fundamental indicators, Phillips Edison is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Penn National and Phillips Edison Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Penn National and Phillips Edison

The main advantage of trading using opposite Penn National and Phillips Edison positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Penn National position performs unexpectedly, Phillips Edison can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Phillips Edison will offset losses from the drop in Phillips Edison's long position.
The idea behind Penn National Gaming and Phillips Edison Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Bond Analysis module to evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios..

Other Complementary Tools

Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA