Correlation Between Penn National and Goldman Sachs

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Penn National and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Penn National and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Penn National Gaming and Goldman Sachs Asia, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Penn National and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Penn National with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Penn National and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Penn National and Goldman Sachs

-0.2

Correlation Coefficient

Penn National  Goldman Sachs

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Penn and Goldman is -0.2. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Penn National Gaming and Goldman Sachs Asia in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Asia and Penn National is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Penn National Gaming are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Asia has no effect on the direction of Penn National i.e., Penn National and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Penn National and Goldman Sachs

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Penn National Gaming is expected to generate 1.6 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Penn National is 1.6 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Asia. It trades about 0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Asia is currently generating about -0.12 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,848  in Penn National Gaming on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  92.00  from holding Penn National Gaming or generate 4.98% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	98.41%
Values	Daily Returns

Penn National Gaming  vs.  Goldman Sachs Asia

Penn National Gaming

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Penn National Gaming are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very fragile basic indicators, Penn National may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.

Goldman Sachs Asia

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Asia has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's basic indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.

Pair Trading with Penn National and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Penn National and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Penn National position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.

The idea behind Penn National Gaming and Goldman Sachs Asia pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.