Correlation Between Penn National and Bridger Aerospace

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Penn National and Bridger Aerospace at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Penn National and Bridger Aerospace into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Penn National Gaming and Bridger Aerospace Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Penn National and Bridger Aerospace and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Penn National with a short position of Bridger Aerospace. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Penn National and Bridger Aerospace.

Diversification Opportunities for Penn National and Bridger Aerospace

0.56
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Penn and Bridger is 0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Penn National Gaming and Bridger Aerospace Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bridger Aerospace and Penn National is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Penn National Gaming are associated (or correlated) with Bridger Aerospace. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bridger Aerospace has no effect on the direction of Penn National i.e., Penn National and Bridger Aerospace go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Penn National and Bridger Aerospace

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Penn National Gaming is expected to under-perform the Bridger Aerospace. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Penn National Gaming is 8.09 times less risky than Bridger Aerospace. The stock trades about -0.1 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Bridger Aerospace Group is currently generating about 0.19 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  9.10  in Bridger Aerospace Group on October 10, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5.90  from holding Bridger Aerospace Group or generate 64.84% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Penn National Gaming  vs.  Bridger Aerospace Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Penn National Gaming 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Penn National Gaming are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Penn National is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Bridger Aerospace 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bridger Aerospace Group are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly unsteady basic indicators, Bridger Aerospace showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Penn National and Bridger Aerospace Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Penn National and Bridger Aerospace

The main advantage of trading using opposite Penn National and Bridger Aerospace positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Penn National position performs unexpectedly, Bridger Aerospace can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bridger Aerospace will offset losses from the drop in Bridger Aerospace's long position.
The idea behind Penn National Gaming and Bridger Aerospace Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments