Correlation Between Purecycle Technologies and Aker Carbon

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Purecycle Technologies and Aker Carbon at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Purecycle Technologies and Aker Carbon into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Purecycle Technologies Holdings and Aker Carbon Capture, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Purecycle Technologies and Aker Carbon and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Purecycle Technologies with a short position of Aker Carbon. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Purecycle Technologies and Aker Carbon.

Diversification Opportunities for Purecycle Technologies and Aker Carbon

-0.07
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Purecycle and Aker is -0.07. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Purecycle Technologies Holding and Aker Carbon Capture in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Aker Carbon Capture and Purecycle Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Purecycle Technologies Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Aker Carbon. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Aker Carbon Capture has no effect on the direction of Purecycle Technologies i.e., Purecycle Technologies and Aker Carbon go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Purecycle Technologies and Aker Carbon

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Purecycle Technologies Holdings is expected to generate 2.31 times more return on investment than Aker Carbon. However, Purecycle Technologies is 2.31 times more volatile than Aker Carbon Capture. It trades about 0.19 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Aker Carbon Capture is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  579.00  in Purecycle Technologies Holdings on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  751.00  from holding Purecycle Technologies Holdings or generate 129.71% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Purecycle Technologies Holding  vs.  Aker Carbon Capture

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Purecycle Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Purecycle Technologies Holdings are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively fragile fundamental indicators, Purecycle Technologies unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Aker Carbon Capture 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Aker Carbon Capture has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable fundamental indicators, Aker Carbon is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Purecycle Technologies and Aker Carbon Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Purecycle Technologies and Aker Carbon

The main advantage of trading using opposite Purecycle Technologies and Aker Carbon positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Purecycle Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Aker Carbon can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Aker Carbon will offset losses from the drop in Aker Carbon's long position.
The idea behind Purecycle Technologies Holdings and Aker Carbon Capture pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated