Correlation Between Bank Central and Journey Energy

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Bank Central and Journey Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Bank Central and Journey Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Bank Central Asia and Journey Energy, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Bank Central and Journey Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Bank Central with a short position of Journey Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Bank Central and Journey Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Bank Central and Journey Energy

0.65

Correlation Coefficient

Bank Central  Journey Energy

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Bank and Journey is 0.65. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Bank Central Asia and Journey Energy in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Journey Energy and Bank Central is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Bank Central Asia are associated (or correlated) with Journey Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Journey Energy has no effect on the direction of Bank Central i.e., Bank Central and Journey Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Bank Central and Journey Energy

Assuming the 90 days horizon Bank Central Asia is expected to under-perform the Journey Energy. But the pink sheet apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Bank Central Asia is 1.53 times less risky than Journey Energy. The pink sheet trades about -0.09 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Journey Energy is currently generating about -0.01 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  132.00  in Journey Energy on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (8.00) from holding Journey Energy or give up 6.06% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Bank Central Asia  vs.  Journey Energy

Bank Central Asia

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Bank Central Asia has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest weak performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.

Journey Energy

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Journey Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Journey Energy is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with Bank Central and Journey Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Bank Central and Journey Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Bank Central position performs unexpectedly, Journey Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Journey Energy will offset losses from the drop in Journey Energy's long position.

The idea behind Bank Central Asia and Journey Energy pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamental Analysis module to view fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements.