Correlation Between Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin California

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin California at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin California into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Oppenheimer Rochester Ca and Franklin California Intermediate Term, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin California and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Oppenheimer Rochester with a short position of Franklin California. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin California.

Diversification Opportunities for Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin California

0.96
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Oppenheimer and Franklin is 0.96. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Oppenheimer Rochester Ca and Franklin California Intermedia in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Franklin California and Oppenheimer Rochester is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Oppenheimer Rochester Ca are associated (or correlated) with Franklin California. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Franklin California has no effect on the direction of Oppenheimer Rochester i.e., Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin California go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin California

Assuming the 90 days horizon Oppenheimer Rochester Ca is expected to generate 1.55 times more return on investment than Franklin California. However, Oppenheimer Rochester is 1.55 times more volatile than Franklin California Intermediate Term. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Franklin California Intermediate Term is currently generating about 0.19 per unit of risk. If you would invest  802.00  in Oppenheimer Rochester Ca on December 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7.00  from holding Oppenheimer Rochester Ca or generate 0.87% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Oppenheimer Rochester Ca  vs.  Franklin California Intermedia

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Oppenheimer Rochester 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Oppenheimer Rochester Ca has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Oppenheimer Rochester is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Franklin California 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Franklin California Intermediate Term has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Franklin California is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin California Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin California

The main advantage of trading using opposite Oppenheimer Rochester and Franklin California positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Oppenheimer Rochester position performs unexpectedly, Franklin California can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Franklin California will offset losses from the drop in Franklin California's long position.
The idea behind Oppenheimer Rochester Ca and Franklin California Intermediate Term pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sync Your Broker module to sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors..

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Commodity Directory
Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk