Correlation Between OMX Helsinki and KL Technology

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both OMX Helsinki and KL Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining OMX Helsinki and KL Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between OMX Helsinki 25 and KL Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on OMX Helsinki and KL Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in OMX Helsinki with a short position of KL Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of OMX Helsinki and KL Technology.

Diversification Opportunities for OMX Helsinki and KL Technology

0.04

Correlation Coefficient

OMX Helsinki  KL Technology

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between OMX and KLTE is 0.04. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding OMX Helsinki 25 and KL Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KL Technology and OMX Helsinki is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on OMX Helsinki 25 are associated (or correlated) with KL Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KL Technology has no effect on the direction of OMX Helsinki i.e., OMX Helsinki and KL Technology go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between OMX Helsinki and KL Technology

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon OMX Helsinki 25 is expected to generate 0.51 times more return on investment than KL Technology. However, OMX Helsinki 25 is 1.97 times less risky than KL Technology. It trades about -0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. KL Technology is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  464,650  in OMX Helsinki 25 on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (31,211) from holding OMX Helsinki 25 or give up 6.72% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	96.15%
Values	Daily Returns

OMX Helsinki 25  vs.  KL Technology

Pair Trading with OMX Helsinki and KL Technology

The main advantage of trading using opposite OMX Helsinki and KL Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if OMX Helsinki position performs unexpectedly, KL Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KL Technology will offset losses from the drop in KL Technology's long position.

The idea behind OMX Helsinki 25 and KL Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .