Correlation Between OMX Copenhagen and ISS AS

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both OMX Copenhagen and ISS AS at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining OMX Copenhagen and ISS AS into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between OMX Copenhagen All and ISS AS, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on OMX Copenhagen and ISS AS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in OMX Copenhagen with a short position of ISS AS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of OMX Copenhagen and ISS AS.

Diversification Opportunities for OMX Copenhagen and ISS AS

-0.25

Correlation Coefficient

OMX Copenhagen  ISS AS

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between OMX and ISS is -0.25. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding OMX Copenhagen All and ISS AS in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ISS AS and OMX Copenhagen is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on OMX Copenhagen All are associated (or correlated) with ISS AS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ISS AS has no effect on the direction of OMX Copenhagen i.e., OMX Copenhagen and ISS AS go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between OMX Copenhagen and ISS AS

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon OMX Copenhagen All is expected to under-perform the ISS AS. But the index apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, OMX Copenhagen All is 1.11 times less risky than ISS AS. The index trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The ISS AS is currently generating about 0.19 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  12,800  in ISS AS on November 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,400  from holding ISS AS or generate 26.56% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	98.33%
Values	Daily Returns

OMX Copenhagen All  vs.  ISS AS

Pair Trading with OMX Copenhagen and ISS AS

The main advantage of trading using opposite OMX Copenhagen and ISS AS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if OMX Copenhagen position performs unexpectedly, ISS AS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ISS AS will offset losses from the drop in ISS AS's long position.

The idea behind OMX Copenhagen All and ISS AS pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.