Correlation Between Oppenheimer Rochester and Fisher Investments
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Oppenheimer Rochester and Fisher Investments at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Oppenheimer Rochester and Fisher Investments into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Oppenheimer Rochester Ltd and Fisher Large Cap, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Oppenheimer Rochester and Fisher Investments and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Oppenheimer Rochester with a short position of Fisher Investments. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Oppenheimer Rochester and Fisher Investments.
Diversification Opportunities for Oppenheimer Rochester and Fisher Investments
0.56 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Oppenheimer and Fisher is 0.56. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Oppenheimer Rochester Ltd and Fisher Large Cap in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fisher Investments and Oppenheimer Rochester is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Oppenheimer Rochester Ltd are associated (or correlated) with Fisher Investments. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fisher Investments has no effect on the direction of Oppenheimer Rochester i.e., Oppenheimer Rochester and Fisher Investments go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Oppenheimer Rochester and Fisher Investments
Assuming the 90 days horizon Oppenheimer Rochester is expected to generate 142.0 times less return on investment than Fisher Investments. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Oppenheimer Rochester Ltd is 5.06 times less risky than Fisher Investments. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Fisher Large Cap is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 1,794 in Fisher Large Cap on October 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 26.00 from holding Fisher Large Cap or generate 1.45% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Oppenheimer Rochester Ltd vs. Fisher Large Cap
Performance |
Timeline |
Oppenheimer Rochester |
Fisher Investments |
Oppenheimer Rochester and Fisher Investments Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Oppenheimer Rochester and Fisher Investments
The main advantage of trading using opposite Oppenheimer Rochester and Fisher Investments positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Oppenheimer Rochester position performs unexpectedly, Fisher Investments can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fisher Investments will offset losses from the drop in Fisher Investments' long position.Oppenheimer Rochester vs. Aqr Managed Futures | Oppenheimer Rochester vs. Ab Bond Inflation | Oppenheimer Rochester vs. Short Duration Inflation | Oppenheimer Rochester vs. Simt Multi Asset Inflation |
Fisher Investments vs. Blackrock Moderate Prepared | Fisher Investments vs. College Retirement Equities | Fisher Investments vs. Moderate Balanced Allocation | Fisher Investments vs. Sierra E Retirement |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.
Other Complementary Tools
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets | |
Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance |