Correlation Between Cogent Communications and American Public

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cogent Communications and American Public at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cogent Communications and American Public into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cogent Communications Holdings and American Public Education, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cogent Communications and American Public and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cogent Communications with a short position of American Public. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cogent Communications and American Public.

Diversification Opportunities for Cogent Communications and American Public

0.32
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cogent and American is 0.32. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cogent Communications Holdings and American Public Education in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on American Public Education and Cogent Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cogent Communications Holdings are associated (or correlated) with American Public. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of American Public Education has no effect on the direction of Cogent Communications i.e., Cogent Communications and American Public go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cogent Communications and American Public

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Cogent Communications Holdings is expected to under-perform the American Public. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Cogent Communications Holdings is 1.44 times less risky than American Public. The stock trades about -0.3 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The American Public Education is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,960  in American Public Education on October 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  100.00  from holding American Public Education or generate 5.1% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cogent Communications Holdings  vs.  American Public Education

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cogent Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cogent Communications Holdings are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile primary indicators, Cogent Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
American Public Education 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

21 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in American Public Education are ranked lower than 21 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, American Public reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Cogent Communications and American Public Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cogent Communications and American Public

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cogent Communications and American Public positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cogent Communications position performs unexpectedly, American Public can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in American Public will offset losses from the drop in American Public's long position.
The idea behind Cogent Communications Holdings and American Public Education pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Exposure Probability module to analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope