Correlation Between NYSE Composite and PEPSICO

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both NYSE Composite and PEPSICO at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining NYSE Composite and PEPSICO into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between NYSE Composite and PEPSICO INC 55, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on NYSE Composite and PEPSICO and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in NYSE Composite with a short position of PEPSICO. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of NYSE Composite and PEPSICO.

Diversification Opportunities for NYSE Composite and PEPSICO

-0.23

Correlation Coefficient

NYSE Composite  PEPSICO

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between NYSE and PEPSICO is -0.23. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding NYSE Composite and PEPSICO INC 55 in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on PEPSICO INC 55 and NYSE Composite is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on NYSE Composite are associated (or correlated) with PEPSICO. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of PEPSICO INC 55 has no effect on the direction of NYSE Composite i.e., NYSE Composite and PEPSICO go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between NYSE Composite and PEPSICO

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon NYSE Composite is expected to generate 118.75 times less return on investment than PEPSICO. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, NYSE Composite is 111.3 times less risky than PEPSICO. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. PEPSICO INC 55 is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  10,832  in PEPSICO INC 55 on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (45.00) from holding PEPSICO INC 55 or give up 0.42% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	61.77%
Values	Daily Returns

NYSE Composite  vs.  PEPSICO INC 55

Pair Trading with NYSE Composite and PEPSICO

The main advantage of trading using opposite NYSE Composite and PEPSICO positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if NYSE Composite position performs unexpectedly, PEPSICO can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in PEPSICO will offset losses from the drop in PEPSICO's long position.

The idea behind NYSE Composite and PEPSICO INC 55 pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Alpha Finder module to use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk.