Correlation Between NYSE Composite and Mfs Growth

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both NYSE Composite and Mfs Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining NYSE Composite and Mfs Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between NYSE Composite and Mfs Growth Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on NYSE Composite and Mfs Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in NYSE Composite with a short position of Mfs Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of NYSE Composite and Mfs Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for NYSE Composite and Mfs Growth

0.74

Correlation Coefficient

NYSE Composite  Mfs Growth

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between NYSE and Mfs is 0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding NYSE Composite and Mfs Growth Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Growth Fund and NYSE Composite is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on NYSE Composite are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Growth Fund has no effect on the direction of NYSE Composite i.e., NYSE Composite and Mfs Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between NYSE Composite and Mfs Growth

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon NYSE Composite is expected to generate 2.17 times less return on investment than Mfs Growth. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, NYSE Composite is 1.47 times less risky than Mfs Growth. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Growth Fund is currently generating about 0.12 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  12,030  in Mfs Growth Fund on September 18, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  9,433  from holding Mfs Growth Fund or generate 78.41% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

NYSE Composite  vs.  Mfs Growth Fund

Pair Trading with NYSE Composite and Mfs Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite NYSE Composite and Mfs Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if NYSE Composite position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Growth will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Growth's long position.

The idea behind NYSE Composite and Mfs Growth Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.