Correlation Between National HealthCare and Regional Health
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both National HealthCare and Regional Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining National HealthCare and Regional Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between National HealthCare and Regional Health Properties, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on National HealthCare and Regional Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in National HealthCare with a short position of Regional Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of National HealthCare and Regional Health.
Diversification Opportunities for National HealthCare and Regional Health
-0.48 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between National and Regional is -0.48. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding National HealthCare and Regional Health Properties in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Regional Health Prop and National HealthCare is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on National HealthCare are associated (or correlated) with Regional Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Regional Health Prop has no effect on the direction of National HealthCare i.e., National HealthCare and Regional Health go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between National HealthCare and Regional Health
Considering the 90-day investment horizon National HealthCare is expected to under-perform the Regional Health. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, National HealthCare is 16.65 times less risky than Regional Health. The stock trades about -0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Regional Health Properties is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 153.00 in Regional Health Properties on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 79.00 from holding Regional Health Properties or generate 51.63% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 40.98% |
Values | Daily Returns |
National HealthCare vs. Regional Health Properties
Performance |
Timeline |
National HealthCare |
Regional Health Prop |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Good
Weak | Strong |
National HealthCare and Regional Health Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with National HealthCare and Regional Health
The main advantage of trading using opposite National HealthCare and Regional Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if National HealthCare position performs unexpectedly, Regional Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Regional Health will offset losses from the drop in Regional Health's long position.National HealthCare vs. The Ensign Group | National HealthCare vs. US Physicalrapy | National HealthCare vs. Cass Information Systems | National HealthCare vs. Brookdale Senior Living |
Regional Health vs. Ramsay Health Care | Regional Health vs. Jack Nathan Medical | Regional Health vs. Nova Leap Health | Regional Health vs. Fresenius SE Co |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.
Other Complementary Tools
Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
Analyst Advice Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories | |
Idea Analyzer Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
Idea Optimizer Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio |