Correlation Between National HealthCare and Community Health

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both National HealthCare and Community Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining National HealthCare and Community Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between National HealthCare and Community Health Systems, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on National HealthCare and Community Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in National HealthCare with a short position of Community Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of National HealthCare and Community Health.

Diversification Opportunities for National HealthCare and Community Health

0.26
  Correlation Coefficient

Modest diversification

The 3 months correlation between National and Community is 0.26. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding National HealthCare and Community Health Systems in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Community Health Systems and National HealthCare is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on National HealthCare are associated (or correlated) with Community Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Community Health Systems has no effect on the direction of National HealthCare i.e., National HealthCare and Community Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between National HealthCare and Community Health

Considering the 90-day investment horizon National HealthCare is expected to under-perform the Community Health. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, National HealthCare is 2.22 times less risky than Community Health. The stock trades about -0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Community Health Systems is currently generating about -0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  301.00  in Community Health Systems on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (31.00) from holding Community Health Systems or give up 10.3% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

National HealthCare  vs.  Community Health Systems

 Performance 
       Timeline  
National HealthCare 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days National HealthCare has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical indicators remain rather sound which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest tumult may also be a sign of longer-term up-swing for the firm shareholders.
Community Health Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Community Health Systems has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest uncertain performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain strong and the recent confusion on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-lasting gains for the firm traders.

National HealthCare and Community Health Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with National HealthCare and Community Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite National HealthCare and Community Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if National HealthCare position performs unexpectedly, Community Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Community Health will offset losses from the drop in Community Health's long position.
The idea behind National HealthCare and Community Health Systems pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.

Other Complementary Tools

Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Global Markets Map
Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings