Correlation Between Northeast Community and Investar Holding

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Northeast Community and Investar Holding at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Northeast Community and Investar Holding into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Northeast Community Bancorp and Investar Holding Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Northeast Community and Investar Holding and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Northeast Community with a short position of Investar Holding. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Northeast Community and Investar Holding.

Diversification Opportunities for Northeast Community and Investar Holding

0.69
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Northeast and Investar is 0.69. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Northeast Community Bancorp and Investar Holding Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Investar Holding Corp and Northeast Community is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Northeast Community Bancorp are associated (or correlated) with Investar Holding. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Investar Holding Corp has no effect on the direction of Northeast Community i.e., Northeast Community and Investar Holding go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Northeast Community and Investar Holding

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Northeast Community Bancorp is expected to generate 0.89 times more return on investment than Investar Holding. However, Northeast Community Bancorp is 1.12 times less risky than Investar Holding. It trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Investar Holding Corp is currently generating about -0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,436  in Northeast Community Bancorp on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (96.00) from holding Northeast Community Bancorp or give up 3.94% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Northeast Community Bancorp  vs.  Investar Holding Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Northeast Community 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Northeast Community Bancorp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong fundamental indicators, Northeast Community is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Investar Holding Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Investar Holding Corp has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Even with unsteady performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain relatively invariable which may send shares a bit higher in April 2025. The latest agitation may also be a sign of long-running up-swing for the enterprise retail investors.

Northeast Community and Investar Holding Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Northeast Community and Investar Holding

The main advantage of trading using opposite Northeast Community and Investar Holding positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Northeast Community position performs unexpectedly, Investar Holding can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Investar Holding will offset losses from the drop in Investar Holding's long position.
The idea behind Northeast Community Bancorp and Investar Holding Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets