Correlation Between Needham Aggressive and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Needham Aggressive and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Needham Aggressive and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Needham Aggressive Growth and Goldman Sachs Small, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Needham Aggressive and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Needham Aggressive with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Needham Aggressive and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Needham Aggressive and Goldman Sachs

0.07
  Correlation Coefficient

Significant diversification

The 3 months correlation between Needham and Goldman is 0.07. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Needham Aggressive Growth and Goldman Sachs Small in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Small and Needham Aggressive is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Needham Aggressive Growth are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Small has no effect on the direction of Needham Aggressive i.e., Needham Aggressive and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Needham Aggressive and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Needham Aggressive Growth is expected to generate 0.35 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Needham Aggressive Growth is 2.83 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. It trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Small is currently generating about -0.31 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,151  in Needham Aggressive Growth on October 10, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (117.00) from holding Needham Aggressive Growth or give up 2.27% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Needham Aggressive Growth  vs.  Goldman Sachs Small

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Needham Aggressive Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Needham Aggressive Growth are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Needham Aggressive is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Small 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Small has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's basic indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in February 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.

Needham Aggressive and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Needham Aggressive and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Needham Aggressive and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Needham Aggressive position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Needham Aggressive Growth and Goldman Sachs Small pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Comparator
Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals