Correlation Between Natural Health and China Oilfield

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Natural Health and China Oilfield at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Natural Health and China Oilfield into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Natural Health Trends and China Oilfield Services, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Natural Health and China Oilfield and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Natural Health with a short position of China Oilfield. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Natural Health and China Oilfield.

Diversification Opportunities for Natural Health and China Oilfield

0.34
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Natural and China is 0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Natural Health Trends and China Oilfield Services in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Oilfield Services and Natural Health is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Natural Health Trends are associated (or correlated) with China Oilfield. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Oilfield Services has no effect on the direction of Natural Health i.e., Natural Health and China Oilfield go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Natural Health and China Oilfield

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Natural Health Trends is expected to under-perform the China Oilfield. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Natural Health Trends is 1.08 times less risky than China Oilfield. The stock trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The China Oilfield Services is currently generating about 0.05 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  75.00  in China Oilfield Services on September 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5.00  from holding China Oilfield Services or generate 6.67% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Natural Health Trends  vs.  China Oilfield Services

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Natural Health Trends 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Natural Health Trends has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain comparatively stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The newest uproar may also be a sign of mid-term up-swing for the firm private investors.
China Oilfield Services 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in China Oilfield Services are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, China Oilfield may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Natural Health and China Oilfield Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Natural Health and China Oilfield

The main advantage of trading using opposite Natural Health and China Oilfield positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Natural Health position performs unexpectedly, China Oilfield can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Oilfield will offset losses from the drop in China Oilfield's long position.
The idea behind Natural Health Trends and China Oilfield Services pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities