Correlation Between McEwen Mining and Eli Lilly
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both McEwen Mining and Eli Lilly at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining McEwen Mining and Eli Lilly into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between McEwen Mining and Eli Lilly and, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on McEwen Mining and Eli Lilly and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in McEwen Mining with a short position of Eli Lilly. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of McEwen Mining and Eli Lilly.
Diversification Opportunities for McEwen Mining and Eli Lilly
0.0 | Correlation Coefficient |
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between McEwen and Eli is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding McEwen Mining and Eli Lilly and in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Eli Lilly and McEwen Mining is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on McEwen Mining are associated (or correlated) with Eli Lilly. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Eli Lilly has no effect on the direction of McEwen Mining i.e., McEwen Mining and Eli Lilly go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between McEwen Mining and Eli Lilly
If you would invest 19,800 in McEwen Mining on October 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 0.00 from holding McEwen Mining or generate 0.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Flat |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 98.36% |
Values | Daily Returns |
McEwen Mining vs. Eli Lilly and
Performance |
Timeline |
McEwen Mining |
Eli Lilly |
McEwen Mining and Eli Lilly Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with McEwen Mining and Eli Lilly
The main advantage of trading using opposite McEwen Mining and Eli Lilly positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if McEwen Mining position performs unexpectedly, Eli Lilly can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Eli Lilly will offset losses from the drop in Eli Lilly's long position.McEwen Mining vs. Hoteles City Express | McEwen Mining vs. United Airlines Holdings | McEwen Mining vs. Delta Air Lines | McEwen Mining vs. DXC Technology |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.
Other Complementary Tools
Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated | |
Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments |