Correlation Between Mulberry Group and Booking Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mulberry Group and Booking Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mulberry Group and Booking Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mulberry Group PLC and Booking Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mulberry Group and Booking Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mulberry Group with a short position of Booking Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mulberry Group and Booking Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Mulberry Group and Booking Holdings

-0.62
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mulberry and Booking is -0.62. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mulberry Group PLC and Booking Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Booking Holdings and Mulberry Group is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mulberry Group PLC are associated (or correlated) with Booking Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Booking Holdings has no effect on the direction of Mulberry Group i.e., Mulberry Group and Booking Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mulberry Group and Booking Holdings

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Mulberry Group PLC is expected to under-perform the Booking Holdings. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Mulberry Group PLC is 4.02 times less risky than Booking Holdings. The stock trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Booking Holdings is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  408,717  in Booking Holdings on September 23, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  98,783  from holding Booking Holdings or generate 24.17% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy98.48%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mulberry Group PLC  vs.  Booking Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mulberry Group PLC 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mulberry Group PLC has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Mulberry Group is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Booking Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Booking Holdings are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Booking Holdings unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Mulberry Group and Booking Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mulberry Group and Booking Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mulberry Group and Booking Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mulberry Group position performs unexpectedly, Booking Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Booking Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Booking Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Mulberry Group PLC and Booking Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Volatility module to check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories