Correlation Between Mitsubishi UFJ and Bank of China

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mitsubishi UFJ and Bank of China at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mitsubishi UFJ and Bank of China into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Mitsubishi UFJ Financial and Bank of China, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mitsubishi UFJ and Bank of China and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mitsubishi UFJ with a short position of Bank of China. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mitsubishi UFJ and Bank of China.

Diversification Opportunities for Mitsubishi UFJ and Bank of China

0.34
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mitsubishi and Bank is 0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Mitsubishi UFJ Financial and Bank of China in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bank of China and Mitsubishi UFJ is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Mitsubishi UFJ Financial are associated (or correlated) with Bank of China. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bank of China has no effect on the direction of Mitsubishi UFJ i.e., Mitsubishi UFJ and Bank of China go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mitsubishi UFJ and Bank of China

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Mitsubishi UFJ Financial is expected to generate 0.45 times more return on investment than Bank of China. However, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial is 2.2 times less risky than Bank of China. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Bank of China is currently generating about 0.02 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,160  in Mitsubishi UFJ Financial on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  54.00  from holding Mitsubishi UFJ Financial or generate 4.66% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial  vs.  Bank of China

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mitsubishi UFJ Financial are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile technical and fundamental indicators, Mitsubishi UFJ reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Bank of China 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Bank of China are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile technical indicators, Bank of China reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Mitsubishi UFJ and Bank of China Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mitsubishi UFJ and Bank of China

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mitsubishi UFJ and Bank of China positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mitsubishi UFJ position performs unexpectedly, Bank of China can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bank of China will offset losses from the drop in Bank of China's long position.
The idea behind Mitsubishi UFJ Financial and Bank of China pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Valuation module to check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data.

Other Complementary Tools

Stocks Directory
Find actively traded stocks across global markets
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk