Correlation Between Minerals Technologies and Universal Music

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Minerals Technologies and Universal Music at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Minerals Technologies and Universal Music into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Minerals Technologies and Universal Music Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Minerals Technologies and Universal Music and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Minerals Technologies with a short position of Universal Music. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Minerals Technologies and Universal Music.

Diversification Opportunities for Minerals Technologies and Universal Music

-0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Minerals and Universal is -0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Minerals Technologies and Universal Music Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Universal Music Group and Minerals Technologies is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Minerals Technologies are associated (or correlated) with Universal Music. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Universal Music Group has no effect on the direction of Minerals Technologies i.e., Minerals Technologies and Universal Music go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Minerals Technologies and Universal Music

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Minerals Technologies is expected to under-perform the Universal Music. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Minerals Technologies is 1.78 times less risky than Universal Music. The stock trades about -0.23 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Universal Music Group is currently generating about 0.19 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,365  in Universal Music Group on September 27, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  231.00  from holding Universal Music Group or generate 9.77% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Minerals Technologies  vs.  Universal Music Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Minerals Technologies 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

1 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Minerals Technologies are ranked lower than 1 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Minerals Technologies is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Universal Music Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Universal Music Group has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Universal Music is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Minerals Technologies and Universal Music Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Minerals Technologies and Universal Music

The main advantage of trading using opposite Minerals Technologies and Universal Music positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Minerals Technologies position performs unexpectedly, Universal Music can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Universal Music will offset losses from the drop in Universal Music's long position.
The idea behind Minerals Technologies and Universal Music Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pair Correlation module to compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk