Correlation Between Microsoft and Legal General

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Legal General at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Legal General into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Legal General Ucits, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Legal General and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Legal General. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Legal General.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Legal General

0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Legal is 0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Legal General Ucits in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Legal General Ucits and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Legal General. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Legal General Ucits has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Legal General go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Legal General

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 1.39 times more return on investment than Legal General. However, Microsoft is 1.39 times more volatile than Legal General Ucits. It trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Legal General Ucits is currently generating about -0.15 per unit of risk. If you would invest  42,398  in Microsoft on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3,340) from holding Microsoft or give up 7.88% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy90.16%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Legal General Ucits

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Microsoft has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest abnormal performance, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain stable and the newest uproar on Wall Street may also be a sign of mid-term gains for the firm private investors.
Legal General Ucits 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Legal General Ucits has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest fragile performance, the Etf's technical and fundamental indicators remain sound and the latest tumult on Wall Street may also be a sign of longer-term gains for the fund shareholders.

Microsoft and Legal General Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Legal General

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Legal General positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Legal General can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Legal General will offset losses from the drop in Legal General's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Legal General Ucits pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities