Correlation Between Microsoft and 26442UAC8
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and 26442UAC8 and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of 26442UAC8. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and 26442UAC8.
Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and 26442UAC8
Good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and 26442UAC8 is -0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with 26442UAC8. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and 26442UAC8 go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Microsoft and 26442UAC8
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 0.97 times more return on investment than 26442UAC8. However, Microsoft is 1.03 times less risky than 26442UAC8. It trades about -0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS is currently generating about -0.21 per unit of risk. If you would invest 44,602 in Microsoft on October 8, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (1,817) from holding Microsoft or give up 4.07% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 57.89% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Microsoft vs. DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
Performance |
Timeline |
Microsoft |
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS |
Microsoft and 26442UAC8 Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Microsoft and 26442UAC8
The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and 26442UAC8 positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, 26442UAC8 can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in 26442UAC8 will offset losses from the drop in 26442UAC8's long position.Microsoft vs. Palo Alto Networks | Microsoft vs. Uipath Inc | Microsoft vs. Block Inc | Microsoft vs. Adobe Systems Incorporated |
26442UAC8 vs. CECO Environmental Corp | 26442UAC8 vs. Flexible Solutions International | 26442UAC8 vs. Parker Hannifin | 26442UAC8 vs. Universal Stainless Alloy |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.
Other Complementary Tools
Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Global Correlations Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals |