Correlation Between Microsoft and ST Energy
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and ST Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and ST Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and ST Energy Transition, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and ST Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of ST Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and ST Energy.
Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and ST Energy
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and STET is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and ST Energy Transition in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ST Energy Transition and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with ST Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ST Energy Transition has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and ST Energy go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Microsoft and ST Energy
If you would invest (100.00) in ST Energy Transition on December 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 100.00 from holding ST Energy Transition or generate -100.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Flat |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 0.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Microsoft vs. ST Energy Transition
Performance |
Timeline |
Microsoft |
ST Energy Transition |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Very Weak
Weak | Strong |
Microsoft and ST Energy Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Microsoft and ST Energy
The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and ST Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, ST Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ST Energy will offset losses from the drop in ST Energy's long position.Microsoft vs. Palo Alto Networks | Microsoft vs. Uipath Inc | Microsoft vs. Adobe Systems Incorporated | Microsoft vs. Crowdstrike Holdings |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Fundamentals Comparison module to compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities.
Other Complementary Tools
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
Portfolio Volatility Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk | |
Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
Idea Optimizer Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio |