Correlation Between Microsoft and Strategic Asset

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Strategic Asset at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Strategic Asset into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Strategic Asset Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Strategic Asset and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Strategic Asset. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Strategic Asset.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Strategic Asset

0.57
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Strategic is 0.57. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Strategic Asset Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Strategic Asset Mana and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Strategic Asset. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Strategic Asset Mana has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Strategic Asset go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Strategic Asset

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 3.76 times more return on investment than Strategic Asset. However, Microsoft is 3.76 times more volatile than Strategic Asset Management. It trades about 0.51 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Strategic Asset Management is currently generating about 0.14 per unit of risk. If you would invest  41,493  in Microsoft on September 18, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,953  from holding Microsoft or generate 9.53% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Strategic Asset Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Strategic Asset Mana 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Strategic Asset Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Strategic Asset is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Microsoft and Strategic Asset Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Strategic Asset

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Strategic Asset positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Strategic Asset can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Strategic Asset will offset losses from the drop in Strategic Asset's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Strategic Asset Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
Earnings Calls
Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges