Correlation Between Microsoft and Plum Acquisition

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Plum Acquisition at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Plum Acquisition into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Plum Acquisition Corp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Plum Acquisition and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Plum Acquisition. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Plum Acquisition.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Plum Acquisition

0.7
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Plum is 0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Plum Acquisition Corp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Plum Acquisition Corp and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Plum Acquisition. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Plum Acquisition Corp has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Plum Acquisition go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Plum Acquisition

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 35.76 times less return on investment than Plum Acquisition. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Microsoft is 28.23 times less risky than Plum Acquisition. It trades about 0.43 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Plum Acquisition Corp is currently generating about 0.55 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  4.29  in Plum Acquisition Corp on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  15.71  from holding Plum Acquisition Corp or generate 366.2% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy70.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Plum Acquisition Corp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Plum Acquisition Corp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

21 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Plum Acquisition Corp are ranked lower than 21 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward-looking indicators, Plum Acquisition showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Microsoft and Plum Acquisition Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Plum Acquisition

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Plum Acquisition positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Plum Acquisition can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Plum Acquisition will offset losses from the drop in Plum Acquisition's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Plum Acquisition Corp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance