Correlation Between Microsoft and Mountain Province

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Mountain Province at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Mountain Province into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Mountain Province Diamonds, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Mountain Province and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Mountain Province. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Mountain Province.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Mountain Province

-0.39
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Mountain is -0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Mountain Province Diamonds in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mountain Province and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Mountain Province. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mountain Province has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Mountain Province go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Mountain Province

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 0.23 times more return on investment than Mountain Province. However, Microsoft is 4.44 times less risky than Mountain Province. It trades about -0.03 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mountain Province Diamonds is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  45,754  in Microsoft on September 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (2,701) from holding Microsoft or give up 5.9% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy99.21%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Mountain Province Diamonds

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Microsoft has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Mountain Province 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mountain Province Diamonds has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of abnormal performance in the last few months, the Stock's basic indicators remain very healthy which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The recent disarray may also be a sign of long period up-swing for the firm investors.

Microsoft and Mountain Province Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Mountain Province

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Mountain Province positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Mountain Province can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mountain Province will offset losses from the drop in Mountain Province's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Mountain Province Diamonds pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories