Correlation Between Microsoft and KWG Group
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and KWG Group at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and KWG Group into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and KWG Group Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and KWG Group and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of KWG Group. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and KWG Group.
Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and KWG Group
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and KWG is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and KWG Group Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KWG Group Holdings and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with KWG Group. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KWG Group Holdings has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and KWG Group go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Microsoft and KWG Group
If you would invest 40,862 in Microsoft on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,484 from holding Microsoft or generate 3.63% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Flat |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 98.46% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Microsoft vs. KWG Group Holdings
Performance |
Timeline |
Microsoft |
KWG Group Holdings |
Microsoft and KWG Group Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Microsoft and KWG Group
The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and KWG Group positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, KWG Group can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KWG Group will offset losses from the drop in KWG Group's long position.Microsoft vs. Palo Alto Networks | Microsoft vs. Uipath Inc | Microsoft vs. Block Inc | Microsoft vs. Adobe Systems Incorporated |
KWG Group vs. China Aircraft Leasing | KWG Group vs. Luxfer Holdings PLC | KWG Group vs. United Rentals | KWG Group vs. Air Lease |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.
Other Complementary Tools
Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
Stocks Directory Find actively traded stocks across global markets | |
Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope |