Correlation Between Microsoft and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Goldman Sachs Growth, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Goldman Sachs

-0.21
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Goldman is -0.21. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Goldman Sachs Growth in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Growth and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Growth has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Goldman Sachs

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 2.18 times more return on investment than Goldman Sachs. However, Microsoft is 2.18 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Growth. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Growth is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  36,640  in Microsoft on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  6,081  from holding Microsoft or generate 16.6% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Goldman Sachs Growth

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Goldman Sachs Growth 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Growth has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Microsoft and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Goldman Sachs Growth pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Piotroski F Score module to get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance