Correlation Between Microsoft and ERAMET SA
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and ERAMET SA at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and ERAMET SA into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and ERAMET SA, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and ERAMET SA and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of ERAMET SA. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and ERAMET SA.
Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and ERAMET SA
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and ERAMET is -0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and ERAMET SA in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on ERAMET SA and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with ERAMET SA. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of ERAMET SA has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and ERAMET SA go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Microsoft and ERAMET SA
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 0.33 times more return on investment than ERAMET SA. However, Microsoft is 3.05 times less risky than ERAMET SA. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. ERAMET SA is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest 40,764 in Microsoft on September 3, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,582 from holding Microsoft or generate 3.88% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Microsoft vs. ERAMET SA
Performance |
Timeline |
Microsoft |
ERAMET SA |
Microsoft and ERAMET SA Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Microsoft and ERAMET SA
The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and ERAMET SA positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, ERAMET SA can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in ERAMET SA will offset losses from the drop in ERAMET SA's long position.Microsoft vs. Palo Alto Networks | Microsoft vs. Uipath Inc | Microsoft vs. Block Inc | Microsoft vs. Adobe Systems Incorporated |
ERAMET SA vs. Iluka Resources Ltd | ERAMET SA vs. Giyani Metals Corp | ERAMET SA vs. IGO Limited | ERAMET SA vs. Grid Metals Corp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.
Other Complementary Tools
Top Crypto Exchanges Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges | |
Alpha Finder Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk | |
Portfolio Manager State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals |