Correlation Between Microsoft and Energy Revenue

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Energy Revenue at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Energy Revenue into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Energy Revenue Amer, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Energy Revenue and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Energy Revenue. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Energy Revenue.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Energy Revenue

-0.67
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Energy is -0.67. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Energy Revenue Amer in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Energy Revenue Amer and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Energy Revenue. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Energy Revenue Amer has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Energy Revenue go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Energy Revenue

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to under-perform the Energy Revenue. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Microsoft is 26.09 times less risky than Energy Revenue. The stock trades about -0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Energy Revenue Amer is currently generating about 0.17 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5.20  in Energy Revenue Amer on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2.79  from holding Energy Revenue Amer or generate 53.65% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy98.39%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Energy Revenue Amer

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Microsoft has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest abnormal performance, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain stable and the newest uproar on Wall Street may also be a sign of mid-term gains for the firm private investors.
Energy Revenue Amer 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Energy Revenue Amer are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very weak basic indicators, Energy Revenue displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Microsoft and Energy Revenue Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Energy Revenue

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Energy Revenue positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Energy Revenue can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Energy Revenue will offset losses from the drop in Energy Revenue's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Energy Revenue Amer pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
Funds Screener
Find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges
Fundamental Analysis
View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements