Correlation Between Microsoft and Eternal Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Eternal Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Eternal Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Eternal Energy Public, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Eternal Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Eternal Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Eternal Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Eternal Energy

0.64
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Eternal is 0.64. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Eternal Energy Public in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Eternal Energy Public and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Eternal Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Eternal Energy Public has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Eternal Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Eternal Energy

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 17.79 times less return on investment than Eternal Energy. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Microsoft is 17.6 times less risky than Eternal Energy. It trades about 0.43 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Eternal Energy Public is currently generating about 0.44 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  20.00  in Eternal Energy Public on September 17, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  38.00  from holding Eternal Energy Public or generate 190.0% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy95.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Eternal Energy Public

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Eternal Energy Public 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Eternal Energy Public are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite conflicting fundamental drivers, Eternal Energy disclosed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Microsoft and Eternal Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Eternal Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Eternal Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Eternal Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Eternal Energy will offset losses from the drop in Eternal Energy's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Eternal Energy Public pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stocks Directory module to find actively traded stocks across global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Sync Your Broker
Sync your existing holdings, watchlists, positions or portfolios from thousands of online brokerage services, banks, investment account aggregators and robo-advisors.
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios