Correlation Between Microsoft and CTS
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and CTS at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and CTS into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and CTS Corporation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and CTS and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of CTS. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and CTS.
Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and CTS
Almost no diversification
The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and CTS is 0.91. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and CTS Corp. in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on CTS Corporation and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with CTS. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of CTS Corporation has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and CTS go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Microsoft and CTS
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 0.96 times more return on investment than CTS. However, Microsoft is 1.04 times less risky than CTS. It trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. CTS Corporation is currently generating about -0.19 per unit of risk. If you would invest 42,398 in Microsoft on December 28, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (3,340) from holding Microsoft or give up 7.88% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Microsoft vs. CTS Corp.
Performance |
Timeline |
Microsoft |
CTS Corporation |
Microsoft and CTS Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Microsoft and CTS
The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and CTS positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, CTS can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in CTS will offset losses from the drop in CTS's long position.Microsoft vs. Palo Alto Networks | Microsoft vs. Adobe Systems Incorporated | Microsoft vs. Crowdstrike Holdings | Microsoft vs. Zscaler |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Economic Indicators module to top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing.
Other Complementary Tools
Insider Screener Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance | |
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
Money Flow Index Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators | |
Correlation Analysis Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated |