Correlation Between Microsoft and China Resources

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and China Resources at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and China Resources into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and China Resources Power, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and China Resources and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of China Resources. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and China Resources.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and China Resources

-0.05
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and China is -0.05. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and China Resources Power in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on China Resources Power and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with China Resources. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of China Resources Power has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and China Resources go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and China Resources

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 244.17 times less return on investment than China Resources. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Microsoft is 1.46 times less risky than China Resources. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. China Resources Power is currently generating about 0.18 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  213.00  in China Resources Power on October 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  11.00  from holding China Resources Power or generate 5.16% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy85.71%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  China Resources Power

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
China Resources Power 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days China Resources Power has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, China Resources is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Microsoft and China Resources Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and China Resources

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and China Resources positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, China Resources can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in China Resources will offset losses from the drop in China Resources' long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and China Resources Power pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio