Correlation Between Microsoft and Aerospace
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Aerospace Hi Tech Holding, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Aerospace and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Aerospace. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Aerospace.
Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Aerospace
Pay attention - limited upside
The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Aerospace is 0.0. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Aerospace Hi Tech Holding in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Aerospace Hi Tech and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Aerospace. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Aerospace Hi Tech has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Aerospace go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Aerospace
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 0.64 times more return on investment than Aerospace. However, Microsoft is 1.57 times less risky than Aerospace. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Aerospace Hi Tech Holding is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest 41,879 in Microsoft on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,646 from holding Microsoft or generate 3.93% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Flat |
Strength | Insignificant |
Accuracy | 95.45% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Microsoft vs. Aerospace Hi Tech Holding
Performance |
Timeline |
Microsoft |
Aerospace Hi Tech |
Microsoft and Aerospace Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Microsoft and Aerospace
The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Aerospace positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Aerospace can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Aerospace will offset losses from the drop in Aerospace's long position.Microsoft vs. BlackBerry | Microsoft vs. Global Blue Group | Microsoft vs. Aurora Mobile | Microsoft vs. Marqeta |
Aerospace vs. China Construction Bank | Aerospace vs. Ningxia Younglight Chemicals | Aerospace vs. Zhengzhou Coal Mining | Aerospace vs. Uroica Mining Safety |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the CEOs Directory module to screen CEOs from public companies around the world.
Other Complementary Tools
Idea Breakdown Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes | |
FinTech Suite Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities | |
Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
Price Exposure Probability Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets |