Correlation Between Microsoft Corp and Restaurant Brands

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft Corp and Restaurant Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft Corp and Restaurant Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft Corp CDR and Restaurant Brands International, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft Corp and Restaurant Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft Corp with a short position of Restaurant Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft Corp and Restaurant Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft Corp and Restaurant Brands

0.17

Correlation Coefficient

Microsoft Corp  Restaurant Brands

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Restaurant is 0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft Corp CDR and Restaurant Brands Internationa in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Restaurant Brands and Microsoft Corp is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft Corp CDR are associated (or correlated) with Restaurant Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Restaurant Brands has no effect on the direction of Microsoft Corp i.e., Microsoft Corp and Restaurant Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft Corp and Restaurant Brands

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Microsoft Corp CDR is expected to under-perform the Restaurant Brands. In addition to that, Microsoft Corp is 1.16 times more volatile than Restaurant Brands International. It trades about -0.2 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Restaurant Brands International is currently generating about -0.17 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  9,705  in Restaurant Brands International on October 7, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (326.00) from holding Restaurant Brands International or give up 3.36% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Microsoft Corp CDR  vs.  Restaurant Brands Internationa

Microsoft Corp CDR

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft Corp CDR are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft Corp is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Restaurant Brands

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Restaurant Brands International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy basic indicators, Restaurant Brands is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Microsoft Corp and Restaurant Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft Corp and Restaurant Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft Corp position performs unexpectedly, Restaurant Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will offset losses from the drop in Restaurant Brands' long position.

The idea behind Microsoft Corp CDR and Restaurant Brands International pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.