Correlation Between Microsoft and Sabra Health

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Sabra Health at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Sabra Health into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Sabra Health Care, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Sabra Health and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Sabra Health. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Sabra Health.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Sabra Health

0.31
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Sabra is 0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Sabra Health Care in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sabra Health Care and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Sabra Health. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sabra Health Care has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Sabra Health go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Sabra Health

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Microsoft is expected to under-perform the Sabra Health. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Microsoft is 1.1 times less risky than Sabra Health. The stock trades about -0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Sabra Health Care is currently generating about -0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,708  in Sabra Health Care on December 3, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (130.00) from holding Sabra Health Care or give up 7.61% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy98.36%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Sabra Health Care

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Microsoft has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest fragile performance, the Stock's technical and fundamental indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.
Sabra Health Care 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Sabra Health Care has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest uncertain performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-run gains for the company stockholders.

Microsoft and Sabra Health Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Sabra Health

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Sabra Health positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Sabra Health can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sabra Health will offset losses from the drop in Sabra Health's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Sabra Health Care pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk