Correlation Between Morgan Stanley and TIMES CHINA

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Morgan Stanley and TIMES CHINA at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Morgan Stanley and TIMES CHINA into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Morgan Stanley Direct and TIMES CHINA HLDGS, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Morgan Stanley and TIMES CHINA and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Morgan Stanley with a short position of TIMES CHINA. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Morgan Stanley and TIMES CHINA.

Diversification Opportunities for Morgan Stanley and TIMES CHINA

0.15
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Morgan and TIMES is 0.15. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Morgan Stanley Direct and TIMES CHINA HLDGS in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on TIMES CHINA HLDGS and Morgan Stanley is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Morgan Stanley Direct are associated (or correlated) with TIMES CHINA. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of TIMES CHINA HLDGS has no effect on the direction of Morgan Stanley i.e., Morgan Stanley and TIMES CHINA go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Morgan Stanley and TIMES CHINA

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Morgan Stanley is expected to generate 94.59 times less return on investment than TIMES CHINA. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Morgan Stanley Direct is 5.43 times less risky than TIMES CHINA. It trades about 0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. TIMES CHINA HLDGS is currently generating about 0.24 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2.75  in TIMES CHINA HLDGS on September 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  0.85  from holding TIMES CHINA HLDGS or generate 30.91% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Morgan Stanley Direct  vs.  TIMES CHINA HLDGS

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Morgan Stanley Direct 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Morgan Stanley Direct are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite unsteady fundamental indicators, Morgan Stanley may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
TIMES CHINA HLDGS 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in TIMES CHINA HLDGS are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unsteady basic indicators, TIMES CHINA reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Morgan Stanley and TIMES CHINA Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Morgan Stanley and TIMES CHINA

The main advantage of trading using opposite Morgan Stanley and TIMES CHINA positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Morgan Stanley position performs unexpectedly, TIMES CHINA can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in TIMES CHINA will offset losses from the drop in TIMES CHINA's long position.
The idea behind Morgan Stanley Direct and TIMES CHINA HLDGS pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Premium Stories module to follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope.

Other Complementary Tools

FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum