Correlation Between Morgan Stanley and Nabors Energy

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Morgan Stanley and Nabors Energy at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Morgan Stanley and Nabors Energy into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Morgan Stanley Direct and Nabors Energy Transition, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Morgan Stanley and Nabors Energy and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Morgan Stanley with a short position of Nabors Energy. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Morgan Stanley and Nabors Energy.

Diversification Opportunities for Morgan Stanley and Nabors Energy

0.7
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Morgan and Nabors is 0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Morgan Stanley Direct and Nabors Energy Transition in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Nabors Energy Transition and Morgan Stanley is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Morgan Stanley Direct are associated (or correlated) with Nabors Energy. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Nabors Energy Transition has no effect on the direction of Morgan Stanley i.e., Morgan Stanley and Nabors Energy go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Morgan Stanley and Nabors Energy

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Morgan Stanley is expected to generate 8.11 times less return on investment than Nabors Energy. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Morgan Stanley Direct is 10.45 times less risky than Nabors Energy. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Nabors Energy Transition is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  13.00  in Nabors Energy Transition on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3.00  from holding Nabors Energy Transition or generate 23.08% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy79.07%
ValuesDaily Returns

Morgan Stanley Direct  vs.  Nabors Energy Transition

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Morgan Stanley Direct 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Morgan Stanley Direct are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite quite unfluctuating fundamental indicators, Morgan Stanley may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Nabors Energy Transition 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Nabors Energy Transition are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly inconsistent fundamental indicators, Nabors Energy showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Morgan Stanley and Nabors Energy Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Morgan Stanley and Nabors Energy

The main advantage of trading using opposite Morgan Stanley and Nabors Energy positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Morgan Stanley position performs unexpectedly, Nabors Energy can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Nabors Energy will offset losses from the drop in Nabors Energy's long position.
The idea behind Morgan Stanley Direct and Nabors Energy Transition pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Cryptocurrency Center module to build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Analyst Advice
Analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories