Correlation Between Morgan Stanley and Xingguang Agricultural

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Morgan Stanley and Xingguang Agricultural at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Morgan Stanley and Xingguang Agricultural into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Morgan Stanley Direct and Xingguang Agricultural Mach, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Morgan Stanley and Xingguang Agricultural and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Morgan Stanley with a short position of Xingguang Agricultural. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Morgan Stanley and Xingguang Agricultural.

Diversification Opportunities for Morgan Stanley and Xingguang Agricultural

-0.09
  Correlation Coefficient

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Morgan and Xingguang is -0.09. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Morgan Stanley Direct and Xingguang Agricultural Mach in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Xingguang Agricultural and Morgan Stanley is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Morgan Stanley Direct are associated (or correlated) with Xingguang Agricultural. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Xingguang Agricultural has no effect on the direction of Morgan Stanley i.e., Morgan Stanley and Xingguang Agricultural go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Morgan Stanley and Xingguang Agricultural

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Morgan Stanley Direct is expected to generate 0.19 times more return on investment than Xingguang Agricultural. However, Morgan Stanley Direct is 5.27 times less risky than Xingguang Agricultural. It trades about -0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Xingguang Agricultural Mach is currently generating about -0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest  2,083  in Morgan Stanley Direct on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (16.00) from holding Morgan Stanley Direct or give up 0.77% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy95.16%
ValuesDaily Returns

Morgan Stanley Direct  vs.  Xingguang Agricultural Mach

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Morgan Stanley Direct 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Morgan Stanley Direct has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite quite persistent fundamental indicators, Morgan Stanley is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price mess, may contribute to short-term losses for the institutional investors.
Xingguang Agricultural 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Xingguang Agricultural Mach has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite somewhat strong basic indicators, Xingguang Agricultural is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Morgan Stanley and Xingguang Agricultural Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Morgan Stanley and Xingguang Agricultural

The main advantage of trading using opposite Morgan Stanley and Xingguang Agricultural positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Morgan Stanley position performs unexpectedly, Xingguang Agricultural can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Xingguang Agricultural will offset losses from the drop in Xingguang Agricultural's long position.
The idea behind Morgan Stanley Direct and Xingguang Agricultural Mach pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Balance Of Power
Check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios
Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Portfolio Manager
State of the art Portfolio Manager to monitor and improve performance of your invested capital