Correlation Between Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between The Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Mercantile Investment with a short position of Games Workshop. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop.

Diversification Opportunities for Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop

0.1
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Mercantile and Games is 0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding The Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Games Workshop Group and Mercantile Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on The Mercantile Investment are associated (or correlated) with Games Workshop. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Games Workshop Group has no effect on the direction of Mercantile Investment i.e., Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon The Mercantile Investment is expected to under-perform the Games Workshop. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, The Mercantile Investment is 1.84 times less risky than Games Workshop. The stock trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Games Workshop Group is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  981,607  in Games Workshop Group on September 28, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  335,393  from holding Games Workshop Group or generate 34.17% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

The Mercantile Investment  vs.  Games Workshop Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
The Mercantile Investment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days The Mercantile Investment has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Mercantile Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Games Workshop Group 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Games Workshop Group are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Games Workshop exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop

The main advantage of trading using opposite Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Mercantile Investment position performs unexpectedly, Games Workshop can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Games Workshop will offset losses from the drop in Games Workshop's long position.
The idea behind The Mercantile Investment and Games Workshop Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Global Correlations module to find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets.

Other Complementary Tools

Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Money Managers
Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance