Correlation Between Martin Marietta and Sterling Construction

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Martin Marietta and Sterling Construction at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Martin Marietta and Sterling Construction into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Martin Marietta Materials and Sterling Construction, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Martin Marietta and Sterling Construction and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Martin Marietta with a short position of Sterling Construction. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Martin Marietta and Sterling Construction.

Diversification Opportunities for Martin Marietta and Sterling Construction

0.66
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Martin and Sterling is 0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Martin Marietta Materials and Sterling Construction in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Sterling Construction and Martin Marietta is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Martin Marietta Materials are associated (or correlated) with Sterling Construction. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Sterling Construction has no effect on the direction of Martin Marietta i.e., Martin Marietta and Sterling Construction go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Martin Marietta and Sterling Construction

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Martin Marietta is expected to generate 3.23 times less return on investment than Sterling Construction. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Martin Marietta Materials is 2.45 times less risky than Sterling Construction. It trades about 0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Sterling Construction is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  13,420  in Sterling Construction on October 6, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,770  from holding Sterling Construction or generate 20.64% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Martin Marietta Materials  vs.  Sterling Construction

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Martin Marietta Materials 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

6 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Martin Marietta Materials are ranked lower than 6 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Martin Marietta may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in February 2025.
Sterling Construction 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Sterling Construction are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Sterling Construction reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Martin Marietta and Sterling Construction Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Martin Marietta and Sterling Construction

The main advantage of trading using opposite Martin Marietta and Sterling Construction positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Martin Marietta position performs unexpectedly, Sterling Construction can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Sterling Construction will offset losses from the drop in Sterling Construction's long position.
The idea behind Martin Marietta Materials and Sterling Construction pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .

Other Complementary Tools

Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope