Correlation Between Ming Le and Zurich Insurance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ming Le and Zurich Insurance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ming Le and Zurich Insurance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ming Le Sports and Zurich Insurance Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ming Le and Zurich Insurance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ming Le with a short position of Zurich Insurance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ming Le and Zurich Insurance.

Diversification Opportunities for Ming Le and Zurich Insurance

-0.7
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ming and Zurich is -0.7. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ming Le Sports and Zurich Insurance Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Zurich Insurance and Ming Le is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ming Le Sports are associated (or correlated) with Zurich Insurance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Zurich Insurance has no effect on the direction of Ming Le i.e., Ming Le and Zurich Insurance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ming Le and Zurich Insurance

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ming Le Sports is expected to under-perform the Zurich Insurance. In addition to that, Ming Le is 1.42 times more volatile than Zurich Insurance Group. It trades about -0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Zurich Insurance Group is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,800  in Zurich Insurance Group on December 29, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  380.00  from holding Zurich Insurance Group or generate 13.57% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ming Le Sports  vs.  Zurich Insurance Group

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ming Le Sports 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Ming Le Sports has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest fragile performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the newest uproar on Wall Street may also be a sign of mid-term gains for the firm private investors.
Zurich Insurance 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Zurich Insurance Group are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly uncertain forward indicators, Zurich Insurance reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Ming Le and Zurich Insurance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ming Le and Zurich Insurance

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ming Le and Zurich Insurance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ming Le position performs unexpectedly, Zurich Insurance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Zurich Insurance will offset losses from the drop in Zurich Insurance's long position.
The idea behind Ming Le Sports and Zurich Insurance Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Portfolio Analyzer
Portfolio analysis module that provides access to portfolio diagnostics and optimization engine
Idea Optimizer
Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio