Correlation Between Ming Le and Transport International

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ming Le and Transport International at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ming Le and Transport International into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ming Le Sports and Transport International Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ming Le and Transport International and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ming Le with a short position of Transport International. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ming Le and Transport International.

Diversification Opportunities for Ming Le and Transport International

0.1
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ming and Transport is 0.1. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ming Le Sports and Transport International Holdin in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Transport International and Ming Le is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ming Le Sports are associated (or correlated) with Transport International. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Transport International has no effect on the direction of Ming Le i.e., Ming Le and Transport International go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ming Le and Transport International

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ming Le Sports is expected to under-perform the Transport International. In addition to that, Ming Le is 1.82 times more volatile than Transport International Holdings. It trades about -0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Transport International Holdings is currently generating about 0.03 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  96.00  in Transport International Holdings on December 30, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2.00  from holding Transport International Holdings or generate 2.08% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ming Le Sports  vs.  Transport International Holdin

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ming Le Sports 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Very Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Over the last 90 days Ming Le Sports has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest uncertain performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the newest uproar on Wall Street may also be a sign of mid-term gains for the firm private investors.
Transport International 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Weak

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Transport International Holdings are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Transport International is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Ming Le and Transport International Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ming Le and Transport International

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ming Le and Transport International positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ming Le position performs unexpectedly, Transport International can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Transport International will offset losses from the drop in Transport International's long position.
The idea behind Ming Le Sports and Transport International Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Fundamentals Comparison
Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Financial Widgets
Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets