Correlation Between Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ming Le Sports and Fukuyama Transporting Co, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ming Le with a short position of Fukuyama Transporting. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting.

Diversification Opportunities for Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting

-0.65
  Correlation Coefficient

Excellent diversification

The 3 months correlation between Ming and Fukuyama is -0.65. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ming Le Sports and Fukuyama Transporting Co in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Fukuyama Transporting and Ming Le is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ming Le Sports are associated (or correlated) with Fukuyama Transporting. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Fukuyama Transporting has no effect on the direction of Ming Le i.e., Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ming Le is expected to generate 2.28 times less return on investment than Fukuyama Transporting. In addition to that, Ming Le is 1.01 times more volatile than Fukuyama Transporting Co. It trades about 0.02 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Fukuyama Transporting Co is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,751  in Fukuyama Transporting Co on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  589.00  from holding Fukuyama Transporting Co or generate 33.64% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ming Le Sports  vs.  Fukuyama Transporting Co

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ming Le Sports 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ming Le Sports are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Ming Le unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Fukuyama Transporting 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Weak
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Fukuyama Transporting Co are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Fukuyama Transporting is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ming Le and Fukuyama Transporting positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ming Le position performs unexpectedly, Fukuyama Transporting can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Fukuyama Transporting will offset losses from the drop in Fukuyama Transporting's long position.
The idea behind Ming Le Sports and Fukuyama Transporting Co pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the AI Portfolio Architect module to use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Competition Analyzer
Analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities