Correlation Between Ming Le and Brockhaus Capital

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Ming Le and Brockhaus Capital at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Ming Le and Brockhaus Capital into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Ming Le Sports and Brockhaus Capital Management, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Ming Le and Brockhaus Capital and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Ming Le with a short position of Brockhaus Capital. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Ming Le and Brockhaus Capital.

Diversification Opportunities for Ming Le and Brockhaus Capital

-0.73
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Ming and Brockhaus is -0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Ming Le Sports and Brockhaus Capital Management in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Brockhaus Capital and Ming Le is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Ming Le Sports are associated (or correlated) with Brockhaus Capital. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Brockhaus Capital has no effect on the direction of Ming Le i.e., Ming Le and Brockhaus Capital go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Ming Le and Brockhaus Capital

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Ming Le Sports is expected to generate 2.09 times more return on investment than Brockhaus Capital. However, Ming Le is 2.09 times more volatile than Brockhaus Capital Management. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Brockhaus Capital Management is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  104.00  in Ming Le Sports on September 13, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  15.00  from holding Ming Le Sports or generate 14.42% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Ming Le Sports  vs.  Brockhaus Capital Management

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Ming Le Sports 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Ming Le Sports are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively uncertain basic indicators, Ming Le unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Brockhaus Capital 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Brockhaus Capital Management has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's technical indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Ming Le and Brockhaus Capital Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Ming Le and Brockhaus Capital

The main advantage of trading using opposite Ming Le and Brockhaus Capital positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Ming Le position performs unexpectedly, Brockhaus Capital can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Brockhaus Capital will offset losses from the drop in Brockhaus Capital's long position.
The idea behind Ming Le Sports and Brockhaus Capital Management pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Watchlist Optimization module to optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm.

Other Complementary Tools

Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Options Analysis
Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk