Correlation Between Naked Wines and KINDER
Specify exactly 2 symbols:
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Naked Wines plc and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Naked Wines and KINDER and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Naked Wines with a short position of KINDER. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Naked Wines and KINDER.
Diversification Opportunities for Naked Wines and KINDER
0.31 | Correlation Coefficient |
Weak diversification
The 3 months correlation between Naked and KINDER is 0.31. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Naked Wines plc and KINDER MORGAN ENERGY in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on KINDER MORGAN ENERGY and Naked Wines is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Naked Wines plc are associated (or correlated) with KINDER. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of KINDER MORGAN ENERGY has no effect on the direction of Naked Wines i.e., Naked Wines and KINDER go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Naked Wines and KINDER
Assuming the 90 days horizon Naked Wines plc is expected to under-perform the KINDER. In addition to that, Naked Wines is 3.86 times more volatile than KINDER MORGAN ENERGY. It trades about 0.0 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of volatility. If you would invest 9,403 in KINDER MORGAN ENERGY on December 24, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 31.00 from holding KINDER MORGAN ENERGY or generate 0.33% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Very Weak |
Accuracy | 77.78% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Naked Wines plc vs. KINDER MORGAN ENERGY
Performance |
Timeline |
Naked Wines plc |
KINDER MORGAN ENERGY |
Naked Wines and KINDER Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Naked Wines and KINDER
The main advantage of trading using opposite Naked Wines and KINDER positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Naked Wines position performs unexpectedly, KINDER can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in KINDER will offset losses from the drop in KINDER's long position.Naked Wines vs. Pernod Ricard SA | Naked Wines vs. Naked Wines plc | Naked Wines vs. Crimson Wine | Naked Wines vs. Brown Forman |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.
Other Complementary Tools
Fundamental Analysis View fundamental data based on most recent published financial statements | |
Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
Performance Analysis Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation | |
Companies Directory Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals | |
Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope |