Correlation Between MFS Municipal and Cohen Steers

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both MFS Municipal and Cohen Steers at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining MFS Municipal and Cohen Steers into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between MFS Municipal Income and Cohen Steers Qualityome, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on MFS Municipal and Cohen Steers and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in MFS Municipal with a short position of Cohen Steers. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of MFS Municipal and Cohen Steers.

Diversification Opportunities for MFS Municipal and Cohen Steers

0.74

Correlation Coefficient

MFS Municipal  Cohen Steers

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between MFS and Cohen is 0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding MFS Municipal Income and Cohen Steers Qualityome in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cohen Steers Qualityome and MFS Municipal is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on MFS Municipal Income are associated (or correlated) with Cohen Steers. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cohen Steers Qualityome has no effect on the direction of MFS Municipal i.e., MFS Municipal and Cohen Steers go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between MFS Municipal and Cohen Steers

Considering the 90-day investment horizon MFS Municipal Income is expected to generate 0.52 times more return on investment than Cohen Steers. However, MFS Municipal Income is 1.92 times less risky than Cohen Steers. It trades about -0.08 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Cohen Steers Qualityome is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  563.00  in MFS Municipal Income on October 24, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (25.00) from holding MFS Municipal Income or give up 4.44% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

MFS Municipal Income  vs.  Cohen Steers Qualityome

MFS Municipal Income

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days MFS Municipal Income has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy technical and fundamental indicators, MFS Municipal is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Cohen Steers Qualityome

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Cohen Steers Qualityome has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. Despite fairly strong basic indicators, Cohen Steers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.

Pair Trading with MFS Municipal and Cohen Steers

The main advantage of trading using opposite MFS Municipal and Cohen Steers positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if MFS Municipal position performs unexpectedly, Cohen Steers can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cohen Steers will offset losses from the drop in Cohen Steers' long position.

The idea behind MFS Municipal Income and Cohen Steers Qualityome pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Idea Breakdown module to analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes.